Self-reported psychopathy: a validation study. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources. ![]() Manual for the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R). Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. ![]() The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158. Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859–876. Internal and external validity of scores on the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the paulhus deception scales. Denton: Department of Psychology, University of North Texas. The vulnerability of self-report measures of psychopathy to positive impression management: A simulation study with inmates. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Cross-language consistency of the comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality (CAPP) model. Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Special report: Education and correctional populations. Scoring pamphlet for the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale: SRP-II. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: development, structural properties, and new directions. Manual for the hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd ed.). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–16. Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Effects of positive impression management on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory. An investigation of the relationship between psychopathic traits and malingering on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(2), 169–182. ![]() A comparison of a self-report measure of psychopathy with the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in a UK sample of offenders. Unpublished manuscript.Ĭopestake, S., Gray, N. Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality - institutional rating scale (CAPP-IRS). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Construct validation of a self-report psychopathy scale: does Levenson’s self-report psychopathy scale measure the same constructs as Hare’s psychopathy checklist-revised? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1021–1038. Psychopathy and the perception of affect and vulnerability. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.īook, A. Exploring psychopathic personality traits and moral development in a non-criminal sample. Overall, self-report measures of psychopathy evidence only modest convergence with the PCL-R and have proven to be highly susceptible to PIM.īewsey, K. To identify PIM, we investigated the PPI-R Virtuous Responding (VR) Scale and a modified Social Desirability–Psychopathy (SDP) index for the SRP-4. Predictably, detainees with higher levels of psychopathy were generally able to achieve larger decreases than others on psychopathy measures. Overall, detainees were successfully able to mask their psychopathy, achieving average scores that are even lower than college and community samples. The current study evaluated the ability of jail detainees with moderate and high levels of psychopathy to successfully engage in Positive Impression Management (PIM) on three self-report measures (i.e., SRP-4, LSRP, and PPI–R). Although the PCL-R is considered the general standard for evaluating psychopathy, self-report measures have become more widely available and researched. Psychopaths have long been characterized as having a remarkable disregard for the truth, to the extent that deceit is often regarded as a defining characteristic of the syndrome (Porter and Woodworth 2006).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |